Software :: Get Usage Of Individual Core Using Command In Mac OS

Sep 20, 2010

How to get the usage each core on multi-core support Mac machine using terminal command with guest login?

View 4 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Software :: Terminal Command To Get Usage - Each Cpu Core?

Aug 12, 2010

What is the terminal command to get the usage of each cpu core? I have tried top command but its return only overall cpu usage and also cpuwalk.d command based on the process.

View 1 Replies View Related

OS X Server V10.6 Snow Leopard :: Monitoring Bandwidth Usage For Individual Hosted Sites

Jun 22, 2012

Any good way to monitor bandwidth consumption for individual websites hosted on osx server?

View 1 Replies View Related

Software :: Command Used To Get Usage Of Each CPU?

Jul 19, 2010

Machine using dual-core processor. I need to find out the load on each CPU core. I have tried using "top" command. But, top command is showing the overall usage of cpu. What is command is used to get the usage of each CPU?

View 2 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: Future Of Software Development - Multiple Core Usage

Sep 21, 2010

I am on the verge of buying my first Mac Pro and have a few questions to those with some insight into the software development world before I make my decision on whether to buy a 1cpu or 2cpu MP.I am buying this computer to last me for many years and because of that wondering alittle about the future of software:-)1) Are software developers in general shifting towards making programs that utilize multiple cores? Will games, business software, leasure software etc. slowly start to be made with multiple cores in mind? Or is the trend that multiple core usage is mostly for professional editing?

View 4 Replies View Related

MacBook Air :: Looking For Reliable Notebook (CPU Usage And Core Shutdown)

May 27, 2008

It's the last question before I buy the MBA. I have a program that can run under Win or MAC. That's a Picture convert and compile program work with my project. This program needs 100% CPU to and last 15 minutes to work under my old Pemtium M 1.6Ghz notebook. Usually I do my job use my notebook in home or my desktop PC in office. But occasionally I need to do some compile outside the office.

So I really need to know whether the MBA will definitely shutdown one core when the CPU usage is 100% and last 15 minutes? Or maybe you can tell me if the MBA will shutdown when rendering a project in Mayar or 3D Max last 15 minutes. It's important to me before I buy the MBA. I just need a light notebook and I can do some hard job occasionally, but reliable. I like a Fujisu S6510 too, but it is too expensive and heaver than MBA.

View 4 Replies View Related

IMac :: Core I7 CPU Usage When Machine Completely Idle

Nov 21, 2009

For those of you with a new i7 iMac, if your machine is completely idle, what does your CPU usage look like in Activity Monitor? I'm routinely seeing Finder consume 70-90% of my CPU. The single CPU bar meter view in the dock is basically pegged most of the time. The graph shows it as system usage. If I open the CPU History window, all 8 threads look like they're just about maxed out.

View 2 Replies View Related

MacBook Pro :: Differences Between Core 2 Duo / Core I5 And Core I7?

Dec 4, 2010

I see the numbers of everything from Core 2 Duo, to the slightly faster and cooler Core i3, to the supposedly faster core i5s and i7s. The benchmarks go up accordingly, but I found this does not always equate in a faster experience on most tasks.

Here's my experience so far on processor upgrade:

In one computer trade school re-certification class I am in, we are working with Windows Server 2003 on a Quad Xeon platform and it's incredibly slow.

But in a previous class we had the previous generation server edition on older Xeons, and while not fast, it was much better. On paper the newer multi-core Xeons should have made a difference, but could 2003 server software be that much more bloated than the previous Windows server edition that it would stall like that and make us wish we had the older setup?

I am going to try out the Adobe CS lab and put the new high end Dells to the test there and see if they work better than when we had an older CS version on older Xeon equipped Dells.

I don't know if this is something to do with Dell, or if Apple's increasing processor bumps/generations are going to similarly not make a difference in the speed things appear to go at, whether it's Adobe stuff, server stuff, or anything else that needs power.

I know somebody who plans on a Core 2 Duo, i5 or i7 MBP and I was wondering if the higher end processor is worth it in that case (iMovie being the main program of use).

View 6 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: Quad Core 2006 3.0GHz Versus 2.26GHz 8 Core 2009 Model?

Aug 3, 2009

Just curious as to how much of an improvement in performance I would see upgrading my system as it states above, since my 2006 machine is 3 years old and getting close to the end of my apple care, figured I would trade it in and upgrade.

View 8 Replies View Related

Hardware :: Dual Core Versus Quad Core Imac?

Oct 21, 2009

I do alot of photography with a canon dslr, I also plan to edit short HD videos as well as some photoshop and flash animation work.

Will I benefit greatly from the Quad Core Imac over the Dual Core Imac?

View 5 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: Upgrading Nehalem Octa Core 2.26 Ghz To Mac Pro Westmare Hexa Core 2.66 Ghz

Oct 4, 2010

Has anyone that know if it's possible to upgrade MacPro Nehalem 2.26 to 2.66 Ghz Westmare with the following processors : Intel Hexa Core Xeon? Processor X5650 12M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel? QPI part #:BX80614X5650 ? Could you help me telling if it?s possible to upgrading MacPro Nehalem octa core 2.26 Ghz to Mac Pro Westmare hexa core 2.66 Ghz ?

View 5 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: One Quad Core Chip Versus 2 Dual Core Chips?

Mar 6, 2008

I have an opportunity to get a single 3.0 GHz quad core Clovertown.

Should I go for it? There's no advantage to having two cores in two sockets versus having four cores in one socket, right?

View 6 Replies View Related

PowerPC :: How To Upgrade Dual Core Power Mac To Quad Core?

Apr 1, 2008

is it even possible to upgrade an old dual core powermac g5 to a quad core or even an 8 core.

I have a dual core one and i really need to upgrade to a quad or even 8 but it is so expensive to buy a whole brand new one and i was wondering if there was a way to just get a new processor and more ram or what not.

View 12 Replies View Related

IMac :: New IMacs To Use Both Dual-core And Quad-core Configs?

Feb 2, 2009

[URL]

What you say guys?

I know the same article is on main page

View 2 Replies View Related

IMac :: Is The Quad Core I7 Faster Than The 2008 Octo-Core Mac Pro?

Oct 22, 2009

So the older Mac Pro's from 2008 have 2 2.8ghz Quad Core Intel Xeon processors, without hyperthreading, for a total of 8 cores, and the top of the line iMac has a Quar Core i7 2,8ghz with hyperthreading for a total of 8 (virtual) cores.

With the ghz being the same but less "real" cores, but probably newer CPU architecture, which CPU will actually be faster?

View 3 Replies View Related

MacBook Pro :: 13" MBPs - Core 2 Duo Versus Core I3 Processors

Apr 18, 2010

There's a lot of people wondering if the 13" MBPs would have been a lot better with a Core i3 processor, but everything has been just hangups over perceived old vs. new technology, and really the only thing the Core i3 adds is Hyper-Threading, but it doesn't have Turbo Boost, which helps the Core i5/i7s tremendously. Let's compare using Geekbench since it is cross-platform and one of the few available sources of info...

Core 2 Duo P8600 2.4GHz (~3362)

[URL]

vs.

Core i3 330m 2.13GHz (~3472)

[URL]

Core 2 Duo P8800 2.66GHz (~3700)

[URL]

vs.

Core i3 350m 2.26GHz (~3680)

[URL]

As you can see in both cases, the difference is pretty minimal indeed, and in single threaded applications, the C2D will easily outdo the Core i3 which lacks Turbo Boost and runs at lower clock rates.

And you get a 320M instead of Intel HD graphics with the new 13".

The Geekbench results from the old 15/17" to the new 15/17" are quite an order of magnitude better.

So unless people are expecting Core i5 processors in the 13", sticking to the C2D was actually a good decision, and given the differences between 2.4 and 2.53 isn't so large, one is far better buying the base 13" and then putting the money saved towards a good 7.2k HDD or SSD.

Note - I took averages of the 32-bit numbers and added them.

Note 2 - The C2D Pxxxx are 25W TDP processors, which are more efficient than the Core i3 which are 35W TDP processors. Less heat, better battery life from C2Ds.

View 24 Replies View Related

MacBook Pro :: 13" 2.4 Core 2 Duo Versus 2.2 Core 2 Duo Santa Rosa

Apr 29, 2010

I've been debating whether or not to upgrade my 3 year old 15" Macbook Pro that has a 2.2Ghz Core 2 Duo (Santa Rosa) to the new 13" 2.4Ghz Macbook Pro. FYI... My current system also has 4GB of RAM. Since both systems are Core 2 Duo, what kind of speed bump am I going to see? Would this be a substantial upgrade?

View 15 Replies View Related

MacBook Pro :: Fast Is Quad-core Compared To Dual-core?

May 28, 2012

I'm buying a new MacBookPro but can't decide, due to lack of knowledge, wich one to choose and if there's a noticeble difference between,  15.4" MacBook Pro Notebook Computer 2.2GHz Intel Core i7 Quad-Core4GB of DDR3 RAM500GB 5400rpm Hard DriveAMD Radeon HD 6750M 512MB Graphics15.4" LED-Backlit Glossy Display1400 x 900 Native ResolutionSlot-Loading SuperDrive802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1+EDRFaceTime HD Camera, Built-in MicrophoneMac OS X 10.7 Lion (64-bit) 

and the   13.3" MacBook Pro Notebook Computer 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 Dual-Core8GB of DDR3 RAM (2x4GB)750GB 5400rpm Hard DriveIntel HD 3000 Graphics13.3" Glossy Widescreen Display1280 x 800 Native ResolutionSuperDrive, Secure Digital Card SlotFaceTime HD Camera, Omnidirectional Mic802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1+EDRMac OS X 10.7 Lion 

Besides the screen size, one would be considerable faster?

I use Photoshop and beeing a photographer I deal with large files.

Info:
MacBookPro 2.66GHz 4GB 1067MHz DDR3, Mac OS X (10.6.2)

View 8 Replies View Related

MacBook Pro :: Can Replace 13" Early 2011 Dual Core 2.3GHz Intel I5 With The Coming Ivy Bridge Quad Core

May 29, 2012

The ivy bridge processors are coming out soon (or may already be out). I have heard that macbook pro 13" models might be able to use the new processers due to their lower energy useage. I presume that I will be able to take my mac to an apple store and have it installed. Is this information true?

Info:
MacBook Pro (13-inch Early 2011), Mac OS X (10.7.4)

View 2 Replies View Related

MacBook Pro :: Quad Core Versus Dual Core?

Jan 8, 2011

Just in case Apple surprise us with a Sandybridge Quad core, and even if they don't I was wondering the following.

1 ) During sustained use in 3D gaming does a Quadcore with lower clock speeds beat a dual core with higher clock speeds.

2) Can the quoted turbo speeds be achieved in sustained use (ie 3D gaming where maximal load can be applied for a couple of hours).

[URL]

i7-2630QM
Base Frequency 2.0GHz
Max SC Turbo 2.9GHz
Max DC Turbo 2.8GHz
Max QC Turbo 2.6GHz

i7-2620M
Base Frequency 2.7GHz
Max SC Turbo 3.4GHz
Max DC Turbo 3.2GHz
Max QC Turbo N/A

View 7 Replies View Related

IMac :: Quad Core I5 OR Base Model Core I3?

Jul 28, 2010

I know other threads exist, but they don't have responses specific to me so what's the harm in one more?

So, I am going to be selling my late 2008 15" MacBook Pro this week to get a new 27" iMac and I just need some legitimate advice from those "in the know" on processors.

I plan on having this iMac for about 3 years to do the following tasks:

1.) Record and edit HD cable (1080i) from an Elgato EyeTV HD - will include some encoding of 2+ hour sports game recordings

2.) Some light editing of 720p iPhone 4 clips in iMovie

3.) Surf the web, iTunes, iPhoto, Mail, and all the other standard stuff

Assuming budget is an issue, would you recommend me spending the extra money for a Quad Core i5 iMac or would I be ok based on the info above just going with the base Dual Core i3 model?

Like, will there be a considerable difference in the two machines (factoring in processor and graphics card) that will really be worth the extra $300 - $400 for 3 years of use?

View 11 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: Used 2008 3.2GHz 8 Core Or New 2009 2.93GHz 4 Core - Which Is Best

Aug 5, 2010

I have been offered a 2008 3.2GHz 8 Core with 10GB RAM, ATI 4870, 320HD, no warranty/applecare left.

Or, I can buy a new 2009 2.93GHz 4 Core, 3GB RAM, 640HD, GT120

Both about the same price: $2850.00 USD

Which would you choose, and why?

View 3 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: 3.2GHz Quad Core Versus 3.33GHz 6 Core?

Aug 10, 2010

I'm one of the many many people who are juggling mac pro options in my head.

is the 3.33GHz Westmere worth the extra 640? Probably not, but now much faster will be it? 20%....30%?

I think I'm set on either of these two options, mainly using FCP and photoshop and a bit of motion. maybe a bit of gaming

Also I can max out them four RAM slots and get a 5870 with the extra cash.

View 24 Replies View Related

Intel Mac :: Lion Install On 4,1 Upgraded From Core Duo To Core 2 Duo?

Jun 12, 2012

I've upgraded my iMac 4,1 to a core 2 duo processor in order to install Lion although I still get a message from App Store saying that Lion cant be installed on my computer - I have all the basic system requirments - RAM - free space - latest version of Snow Leopard and  processor ...

Info:
iMac

View 4 Replies View Related

Hardware :: First IMac Core I7 And Core I5 Benchmarks?

Nov 13, 2009

The first Core i7 and Core i5 benchmarks are available. Quite amazing to see how much faster the Core i7 is even compared to the Core i5. (via digg) I'll definitely go for the Core i7 now that I've seen these results.

View 20 Replies View Related

Hardware :: Quad Core I5 2.66 Versus Core I3 3.06?

Oct 7, 2010

As I see the new Speedmark 6.5 test scores come out, I''m taken back somewhat.

I'm buying an iMac for my office which is used for internet, email, heavy excel and word. I like to get 4 to 5 years out of my computer so I'm switching to an iMac. That being said I'm buying a refurbished unit, but am wondering if it's worth the extra 4-500 bucks to upgrade from the 3.06 Core i3 to the 2.66 Quad-core i5??

View 6 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: 3.33GHz 6-Core Or The 2.4GHz 8-Core Westmere?

Oct 8, 2010

They're both Intel Xeon Westmere's, but I was planning on buying the 8-core today. However, another commentator mentioned the 3.33GHz 6-core Westmere being a faster/better choice than the 2.4GHz 8-Core Westmere. Is this due to the 1 6-Core processor versus 2 Quad-Core processors and how the system utilizes threading, etc of each?

View 8 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: Upgrade Quad-core To Octo-core?

Feb 13, 2007

If you have the guts and a few thousand dollars, why wait for Apple to release it?
[URL]

View 14 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: Deciding Between 4 - Core And 8 - Core MP For Gaming In Windows

Jun 4, 2009

I'm considering upgrading my iMac to a Mac Pro using my ADC discount late this summer. I have to have a Mac for my major, as I use a lot of OSX-only programs. However, when looking at all the benchmarks available for the programs I'll use, it seems that half do better with the higher-clocked 2.66 4.core, and half do better with the lower-clocked 2.26 8-core. I'm a pretty big gamer, and so if I'm buying this computer anyway, it'll probably be replacing a PC as my "gaming rig."

And, so, I'm thinking of letting that be my deciding factor. Now, I know that the workstation processors aren't meant for gaming. But, that's not my question. What I'm wondering is, while it seems 99% of games out right now prefer a higher clocks to anything else, would it be wise to purchase the 8-core (thus, even more cores than the currently underutilized 4-cores) model to future proof my system for gaming? Other than GTA IV, will we start to see games in the next year or two that really start pushing 4+ cores?

View 24 Replies View Related

Mac Pro :: Quad Core Vs. 8 Core For Compressor Speed?

Feb 2, 2010

I have a Macbook Pro Core Duo that I use Compressor and it literally takes forever to compress FCP files. I know an upgrade to a Mac Pro would make the compression go faster and I know the 8 Core would make it go extremely fast, but can I do just as good with a Quad Core 2.66ghz. Would that cut my compression time down? An 8 core is a little out of my price range, but i'm pulling toward a Quad Core.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved